333 West San Carlos Street | Suite 1600 | San Jose, California 95110-2726
  • RSS Feed
  • Facebook
  • Google +
  • Linked In
  • Twitter
Call Today 408-780-2230
Default Banner

About

Proactively solving your disputes since 2002

Whether you are dealing with a lawsuit or a complicated legal challenge, facing the California legal system can be a time-consuming, stressful - and, if you own a business, costly - experience. Let the knowledgeable and seasoned…

Learn More ›

Civil Litigation Blog Post

California Protects More than the Federal Government

The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) prohibits discrimination in employment based on nine categories, including age. California protects 13 classes of people from employment discrimination. Whereas federal law requires employers to have 20 or more employees to be subject to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), California law demands employers have only five employees subject to California anti-discrimination laws. While both U.S. and California law protect employees aged 40 years old and more from employment discrimination, it is significantly easier to prove your case in California.

Strict standard in ADEA cases

In a 2009 landmark decision, Gross v. FBL Financial Services, the U.S. Supreme made it considerably more difficult for persons filing age discrimination lawsuits to succeed in their claims against employers. At the age of 54 years old, Jack Gross, employed as a claims administration director, was reassigned to the position of claims project coordinator. Meanwhile, FBL Financial Services created a new position with many of the responsibilities of Gross' previous position. Lisa Kneeskern, who was in her early forties, was given the new job. Gross sued, claiming violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected Gross' claim, holding that a plaintiff claiming adverse treatment because of age must demonstrate that age was the “but-for” cause of the discriminatory treatment. In simple terms, a plaintiff in an age discrimination case needs to show that age was the only factor causing the employer to treat him or her adversely.

Proving age discrimination in California is easier

In 2002, the California State Assembly added age to the list of protected classes included in the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). According to California law, a plaintiff arguing age discrimination in employment only needs to show that age was a motivating factor in the employer's decision. This is a significantly easier standard than the U.S. Supreme Court's new but-for causation rule adopted in Gross. 

If you feel that you are the victim of adverse treatment at work because of your age, an experienced San Jose litigation lawyer can provide you with professional legal litigation services.  Contact our office today for more information.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

In order to help you more quickly, please fill out the quick form and submit.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact Form
Creech Liebow & Kraus
333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 1600
San Jose, California, 95110-2726 USA
408-780-2230